PROBIOTIC FEED ADDITIVES - PERSPECTIVES OF RATIONAL FEEDING OF CALVES

نویسندگان

چکیده

To improve the adaptation of pancreatic microflora to changes in diets calves and for rational use feed, intensive cultivation, it is desirable change composition feed probiotic supplements according age animals. Each group responds differently live weight gain on additives. Feed supplement Immunobacterin-D containing Bacillus subtilis, licheniformis has a positive effect natural resistance, increases average daily preventive diseases digestive tract calves. But 2 months continuous feeding can cause suppression resistance some When baker's yeast added additive (B. B. 1 × 1010 CFU / g, Sascharomyces cerevisiae 109 g), dry form product makes possible with compound feed. The immunobacterin-D 3-month-old experimental animals clinical examination fatness coat condition looked better. Calves during this period increments 276 g previous month, arithmetic mean was 820 ± 180 current 1096 90 which indicates (especially live) productivity at age. For studies heifers farm lower gains weight, we received smaller percentage increase yeast. adding additives dose 40 20 350–400 kg animal had an first 500 17 second 440 30 control 414 12 20.8 6.3 % more than group. confirms pattern increasing additional gain. That is, higher gains, get growth from

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Feed Additives and Feeding Strategies to Replace Antibiotics

Piglets are highly susceptible to enteric disorders immediately after weaning. Piglets have then an immature digestive system, whose capacity for nutrient digestion is impaired by the transition from high quality liquid milk to a solid diet. Diarrhea is common post-weaning and is characterised by reduced digestive capacity in young pigs leading to poor growth performance (Pluske et al., 1997). ...

متن کامل

Feed additives.

Feed additives used to supplement dairy rations can increase daily feed cost from 2 to 65 per animal. The economic response (benefit to cost ratio) varies from $2.00 to $12.00 for each dollar invested in a specific additive. Knowledgeable dairy veterinarians must understand the role of each additive, when it will be beneficial, inclusion level, strategies and limitations associated with an addi...

متن کامل

Comparison of Feed Additives during Preconditioning on Growth and Performance of Beef Calves

The objective of this study was to evaluate the response of weaned calves to different feed additives within a preconditioning supplement. Specifically, alternatives to antibiotics and ionophores were evaluated to determine their effectiveness in improving calf performance and mitigating the stress response observed during the weaning process. Following stratification by bodyweight, sex, previo...

متن کامل

Effect of Different Feed Additives on Growth Performance and Blood Profiles of Korean Hanwoo Calves*

This experiment was conducted on 60 Hanwoo calves comprising five feed additive groups, with 12 calves in each group, to determine the effects of additives at preand post-weaning on growth performance and blood profile. The groups were control, antibiotic (Neomycin 110 ppm), illite (2%), fermented green tea probiotics (FGTP, 0.5%), and mixed additives (FGTP 0.25%, illite 1% and licorice 0.1%). ...

متن کامل

An Overview of Feed Additives

Modern intensive livestock and poultry production has achieved phenomenal gains in the efficient and economical production of high quality and safe animal products and by-products. Furthermore, the overall performance of livestock can be increased by improving nutrients utilization, health status, fertility and efficiency of production. The use of feed additives has been an important part of ac...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Naukovo-tehnì?nij bûleten?

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2312-8402']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32900/2312-8402-2021-125-114-121